5 ms·
In the ones they mentioned, GCE vs EC2, GCS vs S3, and BigQuery vs Redshift, they seem pretty comparable to me.
by nulltype 11y ago
In the ones they mentioned, GCE vs EC2, GCS vs S3, and BigQuery vs Redshift, they seem pretty comparable to me.
- pinkunicorn 11y agoBut what about ECS? Lambda? Role Based Authentication? EBS snapshots?
- boulos 11y agoGKE is miles ahead of ECS, and being based on Kubernetes is huge. We don't really have an equivalent to Lambda (yet?) but classic App Engine isn't actually too far off 'technology-wise' (pay per use, containerized, instant start). Our lack of IAM is beyond painful. We're sorry. We're fixing it. PD has had snapshots since Day 1; they're differential, fast and we even encourage people to use them for super-fast "rsync"!
- nulltype 11y agoAlso I've found the network load balancer to be amazingly better than ELBs.
- pinkunicorn 11y agoHaven't had a chance to try GKE, but I'll give it a whirl for my upcoming project. With Lambda, its the whole ecosystem around it which makes it better than App Engine. A file changes in S3 and you want to do something? Lambda, in a few simple lines of code.
- vyshane 11y agoGKE is why I am personally switching from AWS to GCP. I'm running Kubernetes on AWS at my current gig, but I'd rather not have to build and maintain the cluster myself if I don't have to.
- GlennS 11y agoReading this I just want them all to drop the incomprehensible acronyms.
- pinkunicorn 11y agoEven the terms wouldn't probably make sense unless you've used them. Elastic Block Storage - I surely didn't get what it was supposed to do when I read it loud the first time. Elastic Container Service - "Why the heck is it Elastic!?" was my reaction the first time I read the term.
- inopinatus 11y agoThere is no Elastic Container Service. ECS stands for EC2 Container Service. I realise this isn't any better :-)
- obulpathi 11y agoGoogle Container Engine is far ahead of AWS ECS. Google does not have a counterpart to Lambda and IAM. Block storage is far better with Google Cloud (Things like the ability to mount a drive read-only on multiple instances simultaneously make sharing data breeze. We ran into some weird race conditions related to inode pointers being modified with AWS EBS sometimes). And yes, it supports snapshots.
- vgt 11y agoI like to think that BigQuery is far far ahead of Redshift in terms of performance + scale + manageability + cost (but i may be biased).
- nulltype 11y agoI don't have direct experience with Redshift, but I have heard some stuff. BigQuery has really variable performance for us though, not sure how it compares to Redshift.
- obulpathi 11y agoGCE > EC2, GCS > S3, Big query > Red Shift. Compute engine costs less and gives you more flops per buck compared to EC2. GCS has unified storage interface to all the storage classes. This makes developer life easy. Amazon has two different services (S3 and Glacier). With Redshift, you create a cluster of fixed size and pay for it whether you use it or not. With Big Query, you just pay for what you use.
- redwood 11y agoMarket share difference must be something like 10x