4 ms·
I'm curious how that would be found so quickly - presumably it would have to be the title, because performances are individual. And why would Google even take
by marcosscriven 11y ago
I'm curious how that would be found so quickly - presumably it would have to be the title, because performances are individual.
And why would Google even take such a claim seriously? If you're playing Bach clearly no one has a claim.
- such_a_casual 11y agoIt doesn't work like that. You can take down any video instantly just by filing a copyright against it.
- jacquesm 11y agoIt would appear to me that that is a knife that cuts both ways.
- newjersey 11y agoEven John McCain's people should know this is true. https://www.eff.org/files/mccain_youtube_copyright_letter_10.13.08.pdf https://www.eff.org/files/mccain_youtube_copyright_letter_10... Although their request for special treatment shows they just want YouTube to expedite cases that they care about. http://www.theguardian.com/media/2008/oct/15/john-mccain-youtube http://www.theguardian.com/media/2008/oct/15/john-mccain-you... > "But we believe it would consume few resources - and provide enormous benefit - for YouTube to commit to a full legal review of all takedown notices on videos posted from accounts controlled by (at least) political candidates and campaigns."
- wlesieutre 11y agoNobody at Google looks at the claim, they've got an automatic process where somebody says "I own this." and Google says "OK!"
- e40 11y agoMy understanding is they apply heuristics to the video and audio. They might be Google. Or others, I just don't know.