Now they want to define "meta-research" as stealing, too. I can't imagine how would someone buy that. Knowledge is something you cannot capture, that's why the

Now they want to define "meta-research" as stealing, too. I can't imagine how would someone buy that. Knowledge is something you cannot capture, that's why they have to try to "protect" the symbols. And they can go this far with that deed. Why activists can read and handle degrading words from rich publishers (theft, stealing..), but ignorants cannot read the argument of activists? This is far too confusing to me. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.en.html http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.en.html (I think publishers are feeling threatened as the free culture grows) edit: the speaker explains copyright maths (a special kind of maths used by media lobby experts), very enjoyable :D http://blog.ted.com/the-numbers-behind-the-copyright-math/ http://blog.ted.com/the-numbers-behind-the-copyright-math/