3 ms·
Can you explain if this is any better than redshift, for people who are perfectly okay with redshift’s footprint and dependencies? When I looked at sct itself,
by secure 11y ago
Can you explain if this is any better than redshift, for people who are perfectly okay with redshift’s footprint and dependencies?
When I looked at sct itself, all I could see is the same color values that redshift uses (minus a couple of steps, so the transition is less smooth).
- masklinn 11y agoIf you read the original post[0] sct is not intended to be better than redshift (and probably isn't since as you note the whitepoints are a lifted & pared down version of redshift's), just to be a simpler bridge to the same underlying mechanism. If you're fine with redshift, sct has no value, and thus neither does go-sct (since it's a port of sct) except maybe as a tool to understand how redshift ultimately does what it does. [0] http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/sct-set-color-temperature http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/sct-set-color-temperatur...