3 ms·

Hillay clinton is probably pro-hide-that-hardisk. Rand Paul is libertarian and mostly anti-gov. We need more people like him in Washington.

• Frondo 11y ago
  Nah, what we need is fewer rich people and more women and people of color--a closer match to the actual demographics of the people of the country. I would no sooner put a anti-gov politician in charge than hire a manager who's opposed to the existence of the team he's managing.
  • c0achmcguirk 11y ago
    > Nah, what we need is fewer rich people and more women and people of color Please no sexism, classism, and racism in choosing people. Best people for the job regardless of their income tax bracket or their skin color. Just put people in office that understand how to run a country and limit the powers of government.
    • Frondo 11y ago
      Since our current batch of politicians is predominantly wealthy white men, it seems to me like we may already have sexism, classism, and racism going on. That said, I'm not advocating quotas, and frankly speaking I'm all in favor of getting rid of sexism, classism, and racism. But my money's on, if we did, our politicians at all levels of government would better reflect who they represented.
    • Rusky 11y ago
      This is a common and frustrating sentiment when people try to counter sexism/classism/racism. The real question is this: Is it really true that rich white males are generally more competent? If they aren't, what can we do to remove that bias and get what you ask for? If they are, what's preventing other groups from gaining competence?
      • tn13 11y ago
        Japanese Americans do much better than white males in many professions including higher education does that mean system is biased towards them? How come those politicians who talk non-stop about minorities never mention Jews, Indian Americans, Chinese Americans, Japanese Americans as minorities and extend the same benefits to them ? The reality is that different cultures value different things and pursue different dreams. Only politicians benefit by peddling the agenda that some other group is keeping another group down. As an Indian education was extremely valued in the family, education not only ensured prosperity but status and excellent marriage opportunities. Automatically academic and intellectual success is something I have pursued and probably my children would do the same. My parents sold many items to put me through colleges and I would do the same for my kids. White Americans on other hand have different concepts of status, a football player is considered as cool where as smart boy is considered nerd. Guess who gets more dates ? USA was founded on the principle that people should be free to pursue their own values. What we do not want is politicians forcing needless values on us.
  • baddox 11y ago
    I would hire a manager who's opposed to the existence of the team he's managing if I didn't like the team he's managing and I thought this was the only way to solve it.
  • woodman 11y ago
    > I would no sooner put a anti-gov politician in charge than hire a manager who's opposed to the existence of the team he's managing. That is how you get ever expanding bureaucracy, regulatory overreach, kingdom building and information silos. Those who can see beyond their own team and work to make their department irrelevant are exactly the kind of people you want as managers in your company.
  • merpnderp 11y ago
    Even if those women, like Hillary, have no idea about encryption, but certainly want to have the government closely control who can have want kinds? In this context, anti-government means the government has no business legislating encryption.
  • tn13 11y ago
    I am not sure why and how that helps anyone. Japanese Americans and Indian Americans are least politically influential and extremely better off than every other group. On other hand look at Blacks And Irish Americans. Opposite case. Groups do well when they enjoy freedom, chase opportunities freely, compete and drink less. Not when someone from their community is elected. You are completely wrong about the manager aspect. A good manager will always keep the team lean, less red tape and maximize the freedom of the team members as well as the customers they are serving. managers on other hand will always claim their more resources which they will spend on their own lavish lifestyle and problems that did not need solving in first place. Obama is a good example.