3 ms·
This would be a suspension of the 4th and 5th amendment. Correct me if I am wrong. "...A valid search warrant must meet four requirements: (1) the warrant must
by SCAQTony 11y ago
This would be a suspension of the 4th and 5th amendment. Correct me if I am wrong.
"...A valid search warrant must meet four requirements: (1) the warrant must be filed in good faith by a law enforcement officer; (2) the warrant must be based on reliable information showing probable cause to search; (3) the warrant must be issued by a neutral and detached magistrate; and (4) the warrant must state specifically the place to be searched and the items to be seized..."
https://www.justia.com/criminal/docs/search-seizure-faq.html https://www.justia.com/criminal/docs/search-seizure-faq.html
This McCain B.S. implies that the defendant will never be served with a warrant. This secret warrant will be issued by eleven secret judges, serving a seven year term, picked by one man "...without any supplemental confirmation from the other two branches of government."
This does not meet the standards of being neutral per point number 3 above. WOW!
http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/17/politics/surveillance-court/ http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/17/politics/surveillance-court/
- nicholaides 11y agoIt's also a 2nd amendment issue. From wikipedia: Since World War II, many governments, including the U.S. and its NATO allies, have regulated the export of cryptography for national security considerations, and, as late as 1992, cryptography was on the U.S. Munitions List as an Auxiliary Military Equipment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_from_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_from_th...