2 ms·

>it's a mark of intelligence to follow along< So sheep are markedly intelligent? >a bit of a cheat< It is not the cake that cheats. >I meant no insult< I

by igouy 11y ago

>it's a mark of intelligence to follow along< So sheep are markedly intelligent? >a bit of a cheat< It is not the cake that cheats. >I meant no insult< I don't think you're confused about how all these comments you've made about cheating will be read.

Veedrac 11y ago
As I said, > I don't want to get into a semantic quibble If you'd rather the semantic quibble than actually address the concerns I've raised, on your head be it. And I see no reason to trust your statements of my opinion over my own knowledge of my opinion.
- igouy 11y ago
  You started with a semantic quibble and have continued with a semantic quibble for 3 weeks -- "cheating-but-not-cheating".
deleted 11y ago
[deleted]

>it's a mark of intelligence to follow along< So sheep are markedly intelligent? >a ​bit of a cheat< It is not the cake that cheats. >I meant no insult< I

>it's a mark of intelligence to follow along< So sheep are markedly intelligent? >a ​bit of a cheat< It is not the cake that cheats. >I meant no insult< I

>it's a mark of intelligence to follow along< So sheep are markedly intelligent? >a bit of a cheat< It is not the cake that cheats. >I meant no insult< I

>it's a mark of intelligence to follow along< So sheep are markedly intelligent? >a bit of a cheat< It is not the cake that cheats. >I meant no insult< I