You make a causal relation, that in my opinion is correct, between the Mujahideen and ISIS but you only mention the invasion of Afghanistan as it was circumstan

You make a causal relation, that in my opinion is correct, between the Mujahideen and ISIS but you only mention the invasion of Afghanistan as it was circumstantial. It's a more correct theory, I think, to say that the Mujahideen were caused by the invasion of Afghanistan and the support of the CIA in order to mess with the Russians. And we could follow from there. Islam could be a religion of war or only an excuse that those that want to do war use, I have not the answer. But I feel dismay reading the discussion that there is now in Europe and the States. From the comment sections of HN or the NYT to the discourses of the politics, the majority of the commenters forget to talks about, for instance, why there is a "land of nobody" where the creation of a Caliphate is possible. It's like if Irak, Iran, EUA, Europe, Arabia, Israel has nothing to do with what is going here. As if it all the violence comes from something in the water in the region. How is it possible that the Islam nature is our main concern? To those that are so worried about how violent is the Islam I would like to remember that is the destruction of Iraq, Syria, and in general all the area, with uncountable deaths, by the way, what allow those crazy fanatics to be in a position of create a country. Surely some people would like to excuse all that saying that "mistakes were done". Ok, but, at least, we should talk about those mistakes.