I stand by my position that the existence of interpretations that said the bible is a history book and the events in it occurred as depicted, is not relatively

I stand by my position that the existence of interpretations that said the bible is a history book and the events in it occurred as depicted, is not relatively new. If you use the term "literalism" in an academic sense that means something subtly different, then fine. The fact remains that creationism is definitely not even remotely new.