4 ms·
It's true, but it's such a shame. I still remember the day metacritic switched away from their original design [1] where every movie currently in theaters was
by GrantS 11y ago
It's true, but it's such a shame. I still remember the day metacritic switched away from their original design [1] where every movie currently in theaters was in that single column on the left hand side. You visited one page, you looked at it for 15 seconds and you were done. Apparently this was not the best way to make money, but it was so useful.
[1]https://web.archive.org/web/20090117041216/http://metacritic.com/film https://web.archive.org/web/20090117041216/http://metacritic...
- TeMPOraL 11y agoThat's how for-profit world works. It's not about providing value to customer - it's to provide as little value as you can get away with wile still getting paid. If a company can sabotage their customer's experience and make him pay more at the same time (whether directly or via ads), the company will pick that option. This is the incentive gradient that's present everywhere, especially on the Internet - that's why I personally won't mind if ad blocking will kill all ad-supported websites. I'll call it good riddance.