16 ms·
The law favors the defense in these situations. If charges were brought against the agents, then the burden of proof would be to prove that they knew there was
by andrewclunn 11y ago
The law favors the defense in these situations. If charges were brought against the agents, then the burden of proof would be to prove that they knew there was no expectation of privacy. By challenging whether it's admissible the burden of proof goes the other way and it and to be shown that those speaking did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. It's a quirk of the law.
- mikeash 11y agoI understand that, but you yourself are making the much stronger claim that the recordings aren't illegal. You're saying they're legal but inadmissible, which makes no sense to me.