4 ms·
> The other side wants to propagate individual liberty and democracy and takes great lengths to avoid civilian casualties This is why you're wrong. No, the lea
by Natanael_L 11y ago
> The other side wants to propagate individual liberty and democracy and takes great lengths to avoid civilian casualties
This is why you're wrong. No, the leaders (whether it is the politicians or the military command) don't care about civilian casualties unless there's large vocal resistance.
- hueving 11y agoBased on what evidence?
- Natanael_L 11y agoHow about their behavior? Displacing democratically elected leaders like CIA has been doing? Lying about WMDs like with Iraq? Being careless in general? Refusing to change, justifying collateral damage with unproven "national security"? Doing nothing to avoid civilians from being harmed? They're not bothering to ensure the military knows what areas to avoid and confirming who's who before bombing. They so obviously put profits first, and care more about having puppets in the governments than about the people. (It is even more obvious in the case of Russia's support of Assad.) NSA have even admitted they kill on metadata = the position of cell phones, with as much accuracy as programs like COTRAVELER can give you when you have no clue who's who. Guess why so many weddings have been hit? Because somebody 2-3 degrees off from the suspect suddenly meets a hundred people including more people linked to some other suspect. So they bomb the place.