3 ms·
They probably are very generous - I'd imagine the entire country was defined as the "area". The system doesn't work very well if there's false negatives and peo
by chipperyman573 11y ago
They probably are very generous - I'd imagine the entire country was defined as the "area". The system doesn't work very well if there's false negatives and people don't see it, and if someone sees it but shouldn't all they have to do is hit that they're OK.
- xxbondsxx 11y agoNot quite @chipperyman573. A few points to make here: -- Since we only have city-level location for most users, declaring the area isn't as hard as drawing on a map. We usually just select a number of cities, regions, states, or countries that are affected by the crisis. -- We always allow people to declare themselves into the crisis (or out) in case our geolocation prediction is inaccurate. This means we can be a bit more selective with the geographic area, since we want to be pretty high signal with our notifications. We actually use notification click-through and conversion rates as downstream signals on how well a launch went. -- For something like Paris, we actually just selected the whole city and launched. Especially with the media reporting "Paris terror attacks," this seemed like a good fit.
- smackfu 11y agoFrance is a pretty big country. If you are in Nice, you are a nine hour drive from Paris. It would seem a bit silly to ask if you were okay, and not someone in Belgium who is much, much closer.
- cortesoft 11y agoIt is only about 248 thousand square miles... which is smaller than Texas.
- c22 11y agoI got a safety check because my home city is listed as "Paris", but I was not actually in Paris. I consistently reject requests to share my location though, so it's possible Facebook has more precise information about other users.