Thats a very good question which probably deserves a better answer than I can offer. But I'll have a go. My first premise is that I think those who achieve su

Thats a very good question which probably deserves a better answer than I can offer. But I'll have a go. My first premise is that I think those who achieve success via "fair" competition tend to be better qualified than those who achieve it other ways. My second premise is that over time successful founders should expect to find themselves in positions of power and influence beyond the scope of their initial successes. My last premise is that societies avoid the worst types of social injustice when no single culture or way of thinking dominates the others. While heterogeneous societies may not make as much "progress" as homogeneous ones, they also avoid the worst cases. Based on this, I think we'll have a better society if there are more qualified women at the top, but to have that we need more qualified women at all stages of the competition.