3 ms·
I think the most important truth about dog evolution is that we still don't know how it happened. Dawkins only discusses one of many plausible theories that ha
by akamaka 17y ago
I think the most important truth about dog evolution is that we still don't know how it happened. Dawkins only discusses one of many plausible theories that have been put forward (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_the_domestic_dog http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_the_domestic_dog).
We still live in a mysterious world, with lots of unanswered questions and plenty of avenues of exploration open to anyone curious enough to pursue them!
- fnid 17y agoI think we kind of know. I mean, wolves and dog like creatures live along side humans all over the world. They hunt with us and eat what we leave behind and we use things or did for a long time, things they left behind. It's only natural that the ones that shared knowledge with each other among the group benefited more along the direction of a shared ability to communicate amongst themselves than would members of groups that did not care to share such a bond. ref: http://tolweb.org/treehouses/?treehouse_id=3804 http://tolweb.org/treehouses/?treehouse_id=3804 We see avatar and see how far into the future he saw those animals and they had evolved these complicated neuronal cross species connections. Now if you believe in evolution, then you can't argue with that as a potential reality in the future. In a way, it does exist across species now in more trivial forms, including, if you will allow me, eye contact. I would offer to suggest that eye contact may actually be one of the first forms of cross species and even family. Birds, fish, all kinds of mammals... You can make eye contact and communicate with them if you have the patience. The more primitive the organism, the more patience is required to communicate with it -- if it can communicate.