I think the sensible argument for advocates of strong privacy has been touched upon in the article when they mentioned China. At least that's my "debate tactic"

I think the sensible argument for advocates of strong privacy has been touched upon in the article when they mentioned China. At least that's my "debate tactic". The argument is basically "we need strong crypto because it allows people living in ISIS dominated regions to communicate safely and escape without the danger of having their communication intercepted and having a kill team visit them"