4 ms·

I am confused, the wikipedia article you link to says "In October 2010, the postmortem—including the pathologist's 14-page report and the six-page toxicology r

by dfc 11y ago

I am confused, the wikipedia article you link to says "In October 2010, the postmortem—including the pathologist's 14-page report and the six-page toxicology report—was made public, re-iterating the conclusion of the Hutton report." The subtitle to the linked Guardian article is, "Government releases previously secret medical files on death of weapons inspector at centre of BBC's Iraq dossier story." What is it that you want to see?

SixSigma 11y ago
Hmm maybe I have fallen for the headlines accompanying the recent sealing as though it were revelatory when really it is back to normal practice of medical records being private.
- dfc 11y ago
  What is the recent sealing?
  - SixSigma 11y ago
    Part of the Hutton report that is due any day now....
junto 11y ago
Many believe that the pathologist report and the verdict of the report were fixed. David Kelly's stance on chemical weapons in Iraq was not helping the British government in any way. This relates to the sexed up dossier that took the UK to war, which we now know was a preach of lies and fiction. They needed David Kelly to step aside or give his blessing and backing to the dossier. He didn't, but then magically he did, because he took a walk near his house and an apparently non-suicidal man took his own life. Except there are many discrepancies: http://m.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/uk/doctors-claim-coverup-over-death-of-weapons-expert-dr-david-kelly-29426678.html http://m.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/uk/doctors-claim-coveru...