4 ms·
Wow, going for a walk in the woods is also a pretty good way to avoid be spied on by the government. Better burn the forests down, or at least fill them with vi
by smegel 11y ago
Wow, going for a walk in the woods is also a pretty good way to avoid be spied on by the government. Better burn the forests down, or at least fill them with video-cameras and microphones!
- SixSigma 11y agoUnless you happen to be a govt advisor on Iraq. The medical report was recently sealed by the govt. for 70 years. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Kelly_(weapons_expert) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Kelly_(weapons_expert)
- dfc 11y agoI am confused, the wikipedia article you link to says "In October 2010, the postmortem—including the pathologist's 14-page report and the six-page toxicology report—was made public, re-iterating the conclusion of the Hutton report." The subtitle to the linked Guardian article is, "Government releases previously secret medical files on death of weapons inspector at centre of BBC's Iraq dossier story." What is it that you want to see?
- SixSigma 11y agoHmm maybe I have fallen for the headlines accompanying the recent sealing as though it were revelatory when really it is back to normal practice of medical records being private.
- junto 11y agoMany believe that the pathologist report and the verdict of the report were fixed. David Kelly's stance on chemical weapons in Iraq was not helping the British government in any way. This relates to the sexed up dossier that took the UK to war, which we now know was a preach of lies and fiction. They needed David Kelly to step aside or give his blessing and backing to the dossier. He didn't, but then magically he did, because he took a walk near his house and an apparently non-suicidal man took his own life. Except there are many discrepancies: http://m.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/uk/doctors-claim-coverup-over-death-of-weapons-expert-dr-david-kelly-29426678.html http://m.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/uk/doctors-claim-coveru...