3 ms·
Another point, which is that although the precise composition of alleles in one individual is not known, even a handful of markers are enough to identify a memb
by eggie 11y ago
Another point, which is that although the precise composition of alleles in one individual is not known, even a handful of markers are enough to identify a member of a given family. People will share their genomes because sharing is incredibly beneficial and the risks are indistinguishable from 0. As long as people care about genealogy it will be difficult to prevent identification of your genome at a family level. This has been demonstrated for a set of anonymized genomes that were part of public genomics projects.
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/339/6117/321.short http://www.sciencemag.org/content/339/6117/321.short
> Sharing sequencing data sets without identifiers has become a common practice in genomics. Here, we report that surnames can be recovered from personal genomes by profiling short tandem repeats on the Y chromosome (Y-STRs) and querying recreational genetic genealogy databases. We show that a combination of a surname with other types of metadata, such as age and state, can be used to triangulate the identity of the target. A key feature of this technique is that it entirely relies on free, publicly accessible Internet resources.
Unless we make sharing genomes illegal (and we absolutely should not!) this is going to become a hard fact of life. So we should focus on mitigating potential problems that arise in different ways.
- rtl49 11y agoI wasn't referring to identification (I even specifically mentioned that with respect to forensics). I'm talking about knowing the specific content of a subject's genome, the issue of primary concern. Even if you know the genomes of both parents, you can only evaluate the probability of their offspring possessing any particular combination of alleles. The more alleles you wish to know about, the lower the probability that any particular model is correct. Regardless, you seem to completely disregard the argument for legal protections. If there were laws guaranteeing an absolute right to control one's genetic information, including who may possess it, much of this concern would go away.