3 ms·
I'd venture that's valid for any interaction with journalism these days. You read a story and if you are part of the story you realize how wrong and/or skewed t
by lsaferite 11y ago
I'd venture that's valid for any interaction with journalism these days. You read a story and if you are part of the story you realize how wrong and/or skewed the whole thing really is. Then you start to question how many other stories or articles are the same. Eventually you realize you can only take them with a grain of salt.
- eru 11y agoAs a notable aversion, The Economist's coverage of computer topics seems pretty good, so I trust their other reporting more.