2 ms·
The only question I have is this: Why do we have to rely on Anonymous to do this? Don't get me wrong, kudos to them for having had enough and taking a stand.
by CIPHERSTONE 11y ago
The only question I have is this: Why do we have to rely on Anonymous to do this? Don't get me wrong, kudos to them for having had enough and taking a stand.
But my question is this: Why aren't all of the countries in the G20 actively doing this ALL the time already?
- krapp 11y agoPlausible deniability? Anonymous can be used as a cover for clearly illegal activities which, if overtly connected to a particular government, might do more political harm than good.
- CIPHERSTONE 11y agoCould cyber warfare actions against a terrorist organization be considered illegal when we are actively trying to bomb/kill them? Honestly curious.
- krapp 11y agoI suppose it depends on the consequences of those actions. If Anonymous releases the names of ISIS members and this results in vigilante retaliation against them or their families, then that would probably be questionable at best. Even war has rules and limits, at least in theory, but Anonymous really doesn't have to be concerned with anything but notoriety.
- snowwrestler 11y agoTo do what? DDOS the ISIS website for a couple hours? Does anyone think that Western powers are not conducting cyber operations against ISIS?