The existence of fifty peer-reviewed articles supporting intelligent design (http://www.discovery.org/id/peer-review/ http://www.discovery.org/id/peer-review/)

The existence of fifty peer-reviewed articles supporting intelligent design (http://www.discovery.org/id/peer-review/ http://www.discovery.org/id/peer-review/) suggests to me that peer-review is not always the be-all and end-all of a scientific investigation. There have been numerous accusations that raw climate data is 'processed' using questionable assumptions. I can’t judge that but I would that thought it's better to get to the truth rather than dismissing such claims out of hand with a demeaning personalized epithet. This is especially so given that truly enormous sums of money are at stake. Getting to the truth might well involve examining professional communications between people people supported by taxpayers' cash.