> Kurt would not respond to the substance of what I asked. The jist of his response: “A court order should not shut down any website unless the entirety was no

> Kurt would not respond to the substance of what I asked. The jist of his response: “A court order should not shut down any website unless the entirety was not protected speech. While a ‘true threat’ is not protected speech, there are many views which are protected, even if repugnant”. Forgive me if I misunderstood, but Kurt's response was perfectly apt. The article's author tried to compare a blog with a single unprotected post to a website entirely filled with direct calls to violence. Kurt's response distinguishes these two cases. Shutting down an entire blog due to one post is different from shutting down a website filled entirely with unprotected material.