3 ms·
The major difference there is that LHC data measures processes which are inherently stochastic (because QM), so using these methods is pretty natural. The OP, h
by phreeza 11y ago
The major difference there is that LHC data measures processes which are inherently stochastic (because QM), so using these methods is pretty natural. The OP, however, is applying the same methods to highly complex, but nominally deterministic problems.
- noobermin 11y agoI'm curious about this. A lot of us in the computational world have to deal with able but slow iterative methods for things like fluid dynamics and electromagnetic simulations. I'd be interested to know if this works with MHD, and how well it does.
- phreeza 11y agoIt probably would, but it is harder to get performance guarantees. Seems like a taylor expansion on steroids, but with the taylor expansion you get analytical tractability (to prove correct convergence) along with speed, which you don't get in this case.