The blunt claim is that the way Israel got materials for nuke bombs was from the US, from some place in Pennsylvania, and, IIRC from the claims, that the materi

The blunt claim is that the way Israel got materials for nuke bombs was from the US, from some place in Pennsylvania, and, IIRC from the claims, that the material was plutonium ready for use in a bomb without further processing. The claim was that the accounting error was deliberately overlooked in the US as a way to get Israel the materials and bombs. In the movie Sum of All Fears, a German neo-Nazi bought such plutonium from an Arab, had it made into a bomb, and blew up Baltimore. The plutonium came from an Israeli bomb from an Israeli plane shot down in an Arab area, and some Arabs found the bomb, thought it was worthless junk, sold it to a guy in Damascus who knew that it was an old, lost Israeli plutonium bomb, and sold the plutonium to the German. The German wanted the US to think that Russia set off the bomb. When the hero of the movie communicated with a high, secret guy in Russia, he asked the Russian where Israel got the material, and the Russian said that the US had given the material to Israel. That is, the Russian knew about the accounting error. Once the bomb went off in Baltimore, the radiation spectrum of the material confirmed the origin, US Savannah River, that is, the reactor that had produced it, in the US. Thus, the movie also used the same old story. So, my conjecture here was that the OP was to remind and alert Mideast enemies of Israel about just where Israel got its plutonium, to remind those enemies that Israel does have the nuke bombs. Tough for me to believe that all this has been so difficult for the HN audience to understand. I thought that everyone would understand my first post. What is this, a shortage of coffee in the HN audience?