I don't know about you, but I found Bayesian approach much more intuitive than frequentist one. The only reason to use frequentist approach is to have a procedu

I don't know about you, but I found Bayesian approach much more intuitive than frequentist one. The only reason to use frequentist approach is to have a procedure that you can do with pencil and paper on real problems (and unlike Bayesian methods only under some often weird assumptions). But with computers and statistical packages, that need is going away.