You seem to be implying ... Yes. A significant portion of discrimination is invented, on the basis that women have a motive to do so. Do you agree or disagre

You seem to be implying ... Yes. A significant portion of discrimination is invented, on the basis that women have a motive to do so. Do you agree or disagree? By that same logic ... First, that's an orthogonal issue, why bring it up? Secondly, it's false, because there are no corresponding incentives. there's plenty of data Most of this data has been collected by people with massive and unresolved confirmation bias. Feel free to offer some thoughtful analysis of the actual papers mentioned. Would it be worth my time? Can you give me any reason to believe that this isn't standard issue gender studies material, with methodology so bad that Trofim Lysenko looks like a shining beacon of scientific probity in comparison? I have read enough of those. How, to raise but one point, do these papers deal with confirmation bias?