3 ms·
Not suitable for beaches but it's probably still suitable for industrial use, which is much, much larger than the beaches. It's just that it's not yet cost effe
by pilsetnieks 11y ago
Not suitable for beaches but it's probably still suitable for industrial use, which is much, much larger than the beaches. It's just that it's not yet cost effective to haul sand halfway around the world
- mhb 11y agoDessert Sand And sprinkle on Baked Alaska for a delightful extra crunch!
- abakker 11y agoUnfortunately, desert sand is specifically not useful for one of the largest industrial uses: Concrete. The weathering of sand in a wind-blown environment reduces the sharp edges and makes it significantly less strong. The ideal in concrete sand is as sharp and as new as possible. It is also ideal that it be dust-free, since dust and other very fine particulates also negatively effect strength.
- distances 11y agoSurprisingly, not really even that. As pointed out in the Wired article The Deadly Global War for Sand [1]: "Desert sand generally doesn’t work for construction; shaped by wind rather than water, desert grains are too round to bind together well." [1] http://www.wired.com/2015/03/illegal-sand-mining/ http://www.wired.com/2015/03/illegal-sand-mining/
- stephengillie 11y agoIt's too bad the factories are stationary on land and not mobile. If factories were built on large boats, maybe old container boats, they could just move closer to the resource. It would still be very expensive to move such a bulk, but the costs would be known and could be evaluated against the other costs and profits involved. To extend the idea, space travel might simplify this - if we build factories on very small asteroids, we could possibly move the whole asteroid across the solar system, to be closer to a resource.
- analog31 11y agoIn some uses it depends on what the sand is made of. Specifically, silicon dioxide (silica or quartz) is a chemical feedstock for the making of cement. I don't know what minerals compose desert sand.