3 ms·
To be clear, I'm talking about the former (manipulating it as an opaque value). I've never seen a program (save esoteric Haskell ones) that did anything with f
by colanderman 11y ago
To be clear, I'm talking about the former (manipulating it as an opaque value). I've never seen a program (save esoteric Haskell ones) that did anything with functions that even approached requiring Turing-completeness.
- codygman 11y agoHaskell isn't esoteric.
- colanderman 11y ago"Esoteric" applies to "programs", not "Haskell".