4 ms·
That link is redirecting to an unexpected image for me. Edit: it works if I copy-paste the URL.
by nfm 11y ago
That link is redirecting to an unexpected image for me.
Edit: it works if I copy-paste the URL.
- simoncion 11y agoIs it some item of human genitalia? If so, you've triggered JWZ's anti-image-hotlinking system. There must be something somewhat unusual about your browser or maybe something is mangling HTTP requests on their way to his server.
- nfm 11y agoYes, yes it is. Does the link work as expected for you? The strange thing is that it does work for me if I copy-paste the link (as opposed to ctrl-clicking it). There really shouldn't be much that's different between those two requests except for the referrer header.
- simoncion 11y agoIt does work as expected for me, no matter how I visit the URL. (The first time I viewed the page, I ctrl-clicked the URL.) > There really shouldn't be much that's different between those two requests except for the referrer header. I don't know the details, but I gather that that's a big component of the anti-hotlinking system.
- Analemma_ 11y agojwz just confirmed on Twitter that he blocks requests with HN in the referrer: https://twitter.com/jwz/status/665658171415859200 https://twitter.com/jwz/status/665658171415859200
- simoncion 11y agoOdd. Clicking on the link in the HN conversation works just fine for me. Wait. Does running Firefox in Incognito Mode not send along a referrer?
- 467568985476 11y ago*referer ;)
- simoncion 11y agoI am neither an HTTP server nor client. ;)
- nitrogen 11y agoHuh. I guess we don't have time for jwz, either.
- pronoiac 11y agoFrom a personal email, jwz said I could quote: "Every time [Hacker News drops by] someone launches a DDoS. This time it's a SYN flood. Pretty much like clockwork." This looks like a response to that.
- mappu 11y agoWrapper link: http://nullrefer.com/?https://www.jwz.org/xscreensaver/toolkits.html http://nullrefer.com/?https://www.jwz.org/xscreensaver/toolk...
- PhasmaFelis 11y agoAppears to be one of those bizarre people who gets offended when people link to them. They were more common back when bandwidth was as precious as diamonds, and I see this article dates from that era. On the modern Web, I've never been sure if they don't quite understand what the internet is for, or what.
- honestcoyote 11y agoYou're going to accuse jwz of not understanding the internet? I'm going to assume you have no idea who jwz is.
- PhasmaFelis 11y agoAnyone who actually gets angry when they're linked to (that image seems calculated to offend, not merely deflect bandwidth usage) has some kind of fundamental disconnect with how the internet is used on a day-to-day basis. It may be a social/emotional disconnect rather than a technical one, but it's still a disconnect. I suppose I should acknowledge the possibility that he's just kind of a dick and likes trolling people for lulz. That's not really better, though.
- tedunangst 11y agoIt's his server. He gets to decide how it responds when people send it requests. If there's a disconnect, I think it's the people telling jwz how he needs to configure his server.
- PhasmaFelis 11y ago> It's his server. He gets to decide how it responds when people send it requests. I don't understand why you think this contradicts anything I said.
- scintill76 11y agoSending drastically different content based on where your URL was clicked from, should indeed count as one definition of "not understanding how the hypertext web works." It's also something you're free to do, and the rest of the web is free to stop linking to you in response.