3 ms·

Can someone please explain this sentence: > Now, it’s true that yesterday’s technology is tomorrow’s tech. I don't quite grasp the distinction.

• Terr_ 11y ago
  It's explained in the quote he's responding to.
  • venning 11y ago
    Thanks. Guess I didn't make the connection. Seems odd to call out yesterday's technology as non-trivial only to imply that it will become trivial tomorrow, or at least that appears to be the author's logic.