Agreed on all points. Still the "airports can be hacked using this ninja barcode trick" spin that they put on the story pushes my buttons. -- The "trick" is ab

Agreed on all points. Still the "airports can be hacked using this ninja barcode trick" spin that they put on the story pushes my buttons. -- The "trick" is absolutely trivial and they haven't even bothered to try and confirm it on _any_ real world device. This doesn't stop them from framing it in a way that makes it look like a significant discovery of a new vulnerability which "affects the entire barcode scanner-related industries" and then try to insinuate fear of the possible consequences of that "new discovery": "[It's] really a serious problem, not just a bug people could use to get free beer". Even though it's all based on complete speculation in the first place. In all likelihood, the people building those systems have thought of and closed the attack vector a long time ago (if it was ever there). But of course vice apparently hasn't even asked a single vendor for comment -- maybe the answer would've been "no, it's not a problem in our product". I find it a typical case of vice reporting. They take something that isn't exactly true/new to begin with and then blow it extremely out of proportion. This creates the illusion that only vice has the hottest, rawest and most uncensored stories abut sex, drugs and crime which nobody else reports about like they do (because they are mostly made up by vice). IMO vice is classic yellow press packaged for the hip and trendy geeks of my/our generation. </rant>