"Or allow people in rich neighborhoods to have guns but ban them from ghettos." You have articulated the opposite of what self defense proponents want. Here in

"Or allow people in rich neighborhoods to have guns but ban them from ghettos." You have articulated the opposite of what self defense proponents want. Here in AZ proponents of humans being able to defend themselves got a recent (partial) win with United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez. Talking large groups of people hostage is logistically extremely difficult when even a few % are armed. And to those who say "they will use bombs instead of attacking armed people"... Should bombs be banned too?