> The difference is that screwing up corporate lending might not be as damaging as fudging consumer lending How? On of the reasons that GM was in trouble (afte

> The difference is that screwing up corporate lending might not be as damaging as fudging consumer lending How? On of the reasons that GM was in trouble (after 2007/2008) was that they couldn't secure enough capital to keep their operations running. How would this not have averse effects on the economy?