> Ampache is cool but I found the installation to be too fiddly and easy to break. It could be my incompetence with that product but I prefer subsonic. A java p

> Ampache is cool but I found the installation to be too fiddly and easy to break. It could be my incompetence with that product but I prefer subsonic. A java product which just runs and it runs well. The webinterface desperately needs a good UIoverall but it works and it doesn't get in the way. I use ampache, but you are absolutely correct: it is fiddly, and breaks easy. Subsonic also does "just work". I personally like ampache because it's much less resource-intensive on my webserver, and easier to fiddle with (I'm also a java-hater), but Subsonic is much more approachable.