3 ms·
But seriously now: don’t let yourself be scared off by “category type theory” and other fancy-sounding words. You do not need all of this theoretical backgroun
by kafkaesq 11y ago
But seriously now: don’t let yourself be scared off by “category type theory” and other fancy-sounding words. You do not need all of this theoretical background in order to learn and become a fluent Scala developer. I know, because I have not bothered to look at those things until 4 years with the language. And when I did it’s not like I had an epiphany, throwing out all the code I had written until then. In fact, I was monading all over the place, just had no idea how the things I was building and using were called.
Works for the author, I suppose. Me, I'd prefer to have a solid grasp of the abstractions I'm using -- and an equally solid understanding of how the programming constructs I'm using correspond to those abstractions -- before using them to crank out production code.
- whateveracct 11y agoHere's an example. At my job, we make heavy use of scalaz Disjunctions and Validations along with Applicative/Monadic combinators to handle errors. Everyone on the team is capable of writing and modifying error-handling logic that uses these tools, even though not every developer has a strong working. understanding of what an Applicative or Monad is.