3 ms·
Fwiw, the significant energy usage list on OSX corresponds pretty poorly with real world results. Safari is the most efficient, and Firefox is actually slightly
by epmatsw 11y ago
Fwiw, the significant energy usage list on OSX corresponds pretty poorly with real world results. Safari is the most efficient, and Firefox is actually slightly better than Chrome.
What does the OS X Activity Monitor’s “Energy Impact” actually measure? | Nicholas Nethercote
https://blog.mozilla.org/nnethercote/2015/08/26/what-does-the-os-x-activity-monitors-energy-impact-actually-measure/ https://blog.mozilla.org/nnethercote/2015/08/26/what-does-th...
Chrome vs Safari vs Firefox web browser efficiency
http://blog.getbatterybox.com/which-browser-is-the-most-energy-efficient-chrome-vs-safari-vs-firefox/ http://blog.getbatterybox.com/which-browser-is-the-most-ener...
- vetinari 11y agoThanks for the links, especially the Nicholas Nethercotes' blog is very interesting. To be fair, Google is working on the Chrome efficiency: https://plus.google.com/+PeterKasting/posts/GpL63A1K2TF https://plus.google.com/+PeterKasting/posts/GpL63A1K2TF