4 ms·
Anyone who trashes SICP can probably safely be ignored. See Norvig's review of SICP here (http://www.amazon.com/review/R403HR4VL71K8/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm http://
by sspencer 19y ago
Anyone who trashes SICP can probably safely be ignored. See Norvig's review of SICP here (http://www.amazon.com/review/R403HR4VL71K8/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm http://www.amazon.com/review/R403HR4VL71K8/ref=cm_cr_rdp_per...) for an explanation of why people either love it or hate it.
- Tichy 19y agoI don't think he trashed SICP.
- eru 19y agoI like SICP Wadler does, too. Nevertheless I think he has a point in his critique. (http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/dat/miranda/wadler87.pdf http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/dat/miranda/wadler87.p...) For example - he argues that Scheme has not enough free Constructors. (Look into the pdf for an explanation..)