5 ms·

Is a $20 vps (360MB ram) enough for a small website? I want to get one for me but I don't want to get rammed in the ass when I realize it is not enough and nee

Is a $20 vps (360MB ram) enough for a small website? I want to get one for me but I don't want to get rammed in the ass when I realize it is not enough and need to upgrade to at least 1GB. I see I can get 1GB RAM at prgmr.com for the same $20

JshWright 17y ago
360MB would be plenty for multiple small sites. I run 1 "medium" Django site and 3 smaller Django sites on a 360 with room to spare.
spamizbad 17y ago
More than enough. I run a Django-powered site on a 96meg host on an over-loaded Xen host built with ancient P4 Xeon servers (No VT instructions). I use nginx and sqlite to cope with my tiny amount of available memory. With that said the site sees little traffic (<500 hits a day, peaks ~60 hits in 1 hour), but I've never run into issues.
- varaon 17y ago
  Which distro/OS, out of curiousity? The bane of my experience with low-memory VMs has been finding the lowest-memory server OS.
  - peterwwillis 17y ago
    you could go crazy and use a uClibc buildroot. build it on your desktop and transfer an image to your slice. i use slack, but that's not exactly tiny...
slig 17y ago
I used to run a create-your-own-quiz django powered site with 6k uniques/day(in the last few days), with no cache, and it barely touched my 360 vps. You can see some nice graphs here: http://slig.imgur.com/linode http://slig.imgur.com/linode
- techiferous 17y ago
  Thanks for sharing! How do you interpret those graphs? How do you know when the user experience is slow or when the server is maxxed out?
  - slig 17y ago
    From my experience looking at those graphs, I see that the iorate is pretty low and that the cpu is almost idle. Checking "top", I see that the RAM was sufficient, as there were almost no swap use. I also use chartbeat.com to see how the users are interacting with the site in realtime. They provide also two useful metrics: user load time and server load time. Looking at those, I can see that the user experience is pretty good, and that the server is up and responding very quickly.

JshWright 17y ago

360MB would be plenty for multiple small sites. I run 1 "medium" Django site and 3 smaller Django sites on a 360 with room to spare.

spamizbad 17y ago

More than enough. I run a Django-powered site on a 96meg host on an over-loaded Xen host built with ancient P4 Xeon servers (No VT instructions). I use nginx and sqlite to cope with my tiny amount of available memory. With that said the site sees little traffic (<500 hits a day, peaks ~60 hits in 1 hour), but I've never run into issues.

varaon 17y ago
Which distro/OS, out of curiousity? The bane of my experience with low-memory VMs has been finding the lowest-memory server OS.
- peterwwillis 17y ago
  you could go crazy and use a uClibc buildroot. build it on your desktop and transfer an image to your slice. i use slack, but that's not exactly tiny...

slig 17y ago

I used to run a create-your-own-quiz django powered site with 6k uniques/day(in the last few days), with no cache, and it barely touched my 360 vps. You can see some nice graphs here: http://slig.imgur.com/linode http://slig.imgur.com/linode

techiferous 17y ago
Thanks for sharing! How do you interpret those graphs? How do you know when the user experience is slow or when the server is maxxed out?
- slig 17y ago
  From my experience looking at those graphs, I see that the iorate is pretty low and that the cpu is almost idle. Checking "top", I see that the RAM was sufficient, as there were almost no swap use. I also use chartbeat.com to see how the users are interacting with the site in realtime. They provide also two useful metrics: user load time and server load time. Looking at those, I can see that the user experience is pretty good, and that the server is up and responding very quickly.