1. As cemerick pointed out, let-kw operates inside the function definition. It does not change any semantics. 2. Most keyword arguments for Clojure's built-in

1. As cemerick pointed out, let-kw operates inside the function definition. It does not change any semantics. 2. Most keyword arguments for Clojure's built-in functions follow the calling convention which let-kw makes easy, whereas the pass-in-a-separate-map convention is not used in clojure.core anywhere (that I can think of). 3. I've heard this type of anti-DSL argument before, but no one making it has ever linked to a (source-available) project where this caused a problem. Frankly, I've never heard of a dailywtf-type horror story about this, either. Do you actually have some evidence to support your view?