>not for forcing people to live in smaller homes. Could you point to the part of the article that gave you this impression? You picked up on something I can't

>not for forcing people to live in smaller homes. Could you point to the part of the article that gave you this impression? You picked up on something I can't find in the either the content or the tone. That is, I can't find any part of the article that suggests people should be "forced to live in smaller homes" or even shaming people for choosing larger homes.