4 ms·
9a5da2e28a1d0633f9940bb3242d9efac28385a27d5882d5b14345e4c0b4b0bb I think I did this right. I ran `shasum -a 256` on the zip, but let me know if it doesn't loo
by dubroff 11y ago
9a5da2e28a1d0633f9940bb3242d9efac28385a27d5882d5b14345e4c0b4b0bb
I think I did this right. I ran `shasum -a 256` on the zip, but let me know if it doesn't look quite right.
- 0942v8653 11y agoFor various reasons (at least, metadata and the .git folder) it's very unlikely that you'd get the exact same checksum for the entire zip... you'd need to post the sum for each file individually if you want to compare them.
- baby 11y ago> For various reasons (at least, metadata and the .git folder) it's very unlikely that you'd get the exact same checksum for the entire zip... This sounds entirely wrong to me. Checksums are used all the time to verify the integrity of archives.
- StavrosK 11y agoThe integrity of archives you're supposed to download from a site, not archives you're meant to create yourself.
- blhack 11y agoIf, in the director created when you unzipped this, you did: find . |xargs shasum -a 256 And then posted the output, that would be helpful to people that want to verify these files.