5 ms·
> This is what they should have done. Instead, they chose to distribute a binary of their proprietary (with patent claim [0]), closed source product. Apple doe
by hackuser 11y ago
> This is what they should have done. Instead, they chose to distribute a binary of their proprietary (with patent claim [0]), closed source product.
Apple does the same with their own products.
- dijit 11y ago"the same" what? sending binaries you have to sign yourself.. I doubt that somewhat, they'll be signed by Apple. For FOSS they use: http://www.opensource.apple.com http://www.opensource.apple.com
- cortesoft 11y agoWell, they would sign the binaries themselves if that worked... but you need to sign it yourself to get an iOS device to let you install it.
- callumlocke 11y agoHow is that relevant?