7 ms·

Goddamn it. Shows what I get for waiting to download it. I found a mirror on GitHub, but I haven't verified it: https://github.com/jefferyleo/f.lux https://git

Goddamn it. Shows what I get for waiting to download it. I found a mirror on GitHub, but I haven't verified it: https://github.com/jefferyleo/f.lux https://github.com/jefferyleo/f.lux

hwestbrook 11y ago
I've installed on a 6S, works for me!
walterbell 11y ago
Can someone who downloaded yesterday please publish a sha256sum of the zip (or each file in the directory tree), for comparison with the github mirror?
- dubroff 11y ago
  9a5da2e28a1d0633f9940bb3242d9efac28385a27d5882d5b14345e4c0b4b0bb I think I did this right. I ran `shasum -a 256` on the zip, but let me know if it doesn't look quite right.
  - 0942v8653 11y ago
    For various reasons (at least, metadata and the .git folder) it's very unlikely that you'd get the exact same checksum for the entire zip... you'd need to post the sum for each file individually if you want to compare them.
    - baby 11y ago
      > For various reasons (at least, metadata and the .git folder) it's very unlikely that you'd get the exact same checksum for the entire zip... This sounds entirely wrong to me. Checksums are used all the time to verify the integrity of archives.
      - StavrosK 11y ago
        The integrity of archives you're supposed to download from a site, not archives you're meant to create yourself.
  - blhack 11y ago
    If, in the director created when you unzipped this, you did: find . |xargs shasum -a 256 And then posted the output, that would be helpful to people that want to verify these files.
- kobayashi 11y ago
  Shasum 256 of the Mac zip titled 'f.lux-xcode-master.zip' 38f463ee5780a4f2b0160f9fa21dbe3c78c5d80d3c093e4ff553aaca230e2898
  - walterbell 11y ago
    Thanks. This matches the mirror at http://www.dropbox.com/s/lcfbd7jqgyxq1au/f.lux-xcode-master.zip?dl=0 http://www.dropbox.com/s/lcfbd7jqgyxq1au/f.lux-xcode-master.... (from a comment at http://www.idownloadblog.com/2015/11/12/f-lux-no-longer-be-sideloaded/ http://www.idownloadblog.com/2015/11/12/f-lux-no-longer-be-s...)
    - Kronopath 11y ago
      I diffed the version on GitHub with the one downloaded from Dropbox (after verifying the Dropbox file's hash). The only changes to the GitHub version are the Readme file and that it was upgraded to target iOS 9.1, as well as some apparently minor changes in the XCode project file. So you won't get the same SHA sum, but all the files aside from those are the same. In particular, the "iflux" binaries are identical. So it looks like the GitHub version matches the original.
      - marrone12 11y ago
        Can confirm. Did the same
      - 100ideas 11y ago
        github version of iflux looks ok for me too: $ cd f.lux-master/ $ shasum -a 256 iflux | grep 10428983a681b07f687511e150f46e39b6f9da506316a8041742a78bc0ce9ef6 10428983a681b07f687511e150f46e39b6f9da506316a8041742a78bc0ce9ef6 iflux
      - kobayashi 11y ago
        You say that it was upgraded to target iOS 9.1. Was the version I downloaded and SHA summed not the 9.1 build?
- raamdev 11y ago
  sha256sum of f.lux-xcode-master.zip and every file inside, downloaded just a few hours before the original link went offline: https://gist.github.com/raamdev/97c625b323fa288cf785 https://gist.github.com/raamdev/97c625b323fa288cf785
jonah 11y ago
For those interested in verifying the f.lux they downloaded from 3rd party sources, there is this thread on the forum providing a hash of the official file. https://justgetflux.com/forum/topic/1267/sha-1-for-ios-sideload https://justgetflux.com/forum/topic/1267/sha-1-for-ios-sidel...

Goddamn it. Shows what I get for waiting to download it. I found a mirror on GitHub, but I haven't verified it: https://github.com/jefferyleo/f.lux https://github.com/jefferyleo/f.lux

hwestbrook 11y ago

I've installed on a 6S, works for me!

walterbell 11y ago

Can someone who downloaded yesterday please publish a sha256sum of the zip (or each file in the directory tree), for comparison with the github mirror?

dubroff 11y ago
9a5da2e28a1d0633f9940bb3242d9efac28385a27d5882d5b14345e4c0b4b0bb I think I did this right. I ran `shasum -a 256` on the zip, but let me know if it doesn't look quite right.
- 0942v8653 11y ago
  For various reasons (at least, metadata and the .git folder) it's very unlikely that you'd get the exact same checksum for the entire zip... you'd need to post the sum for each file individually if you want to compare them.
  - baby 11y ago
    > For various reasons (at least, metadata and the .git folder) it's very unlikely that you'd get the exact same checksum for the entire zip... This sounds entirely wrong to me. Checksums are used all the time to verify the integrity of archives.
    - StavrosK 11y ago
      The integrity of archives you're supposed to download from a site, not archives you're meant to create yourself.
- blhack 11y ago
  If, in the director created when you unzipped this, you did: find . |xargs shasum -a 256 And then posted the output, that would be helpful to people that want to verify these files.
kobayashi 11y ago
Shasum 256 of the Mac zip titled 'f.lux-xcode-master.zip' 38f463ee5780a4f2b0160f9fa21dbe3c78c5d80d3c093e4ff553aaca230e2898
- walterbell 11y ago
  Thanks. This matches the mirror at http://www.dropbox.com/s/lcfbd7jqgyxq1au/f.lux-xcode-master.zip?dl=0 http://www.dropbox.com/s/lcfbd7jqgyxq1au/f.lux-xcode-master.... (from a comment at http://www.idownloadblog.com/2015/11/12/f-lux-no-longer-be-sideloaded/ http://www.idownloadblog.com/2015/11/12/f-lux-no-longer-be-s...)
  - Kronopath 11y ago
    I diffed the version on GitHub with the one downloaded from Dropbox (after verifying the Dropbox file's hash). The only changes to the GitHub version are the Readme file and that it was upgraded to target iOS 9.1, as well as some apparently minor changes in the XCode project file. So you won't get the same SHA sum, but all the files aside from those are the same. In particular, the "iflux" binaries are identical. So it looks like the GitHub version matches the original.
    - marrone12 11y ago
      Can confirm. Did the same
    - 100ideas 11y ago
      github version of iflux looks ok for me too: $ cd f.lux-master/ $ shasum -a 256 iflux | grep 10428983a681b07f687511e150f46e39b6f9da506316a8041742a78bc0ce9ef6 10428983a681b07f687511e150f46e39b6f9da506316a8041742a78bc0ce9ef6 iflux
    - kobayashi 11y ago
      You say that it was upgraded to target iOS 9.1. Was the version I downloaded and SHA summed not the 9.1 build?
raamdev 11y ago
sha256sum of f.lux-xcode-master.zip and every file inside, downloaded just a few hours before the original link went offline: https://gist.github.com/raamdev/97c625b323fa288cf785 https://gist.github.com/raamdev/97c625b323fa288cf785

jonah 11y ago

For those interested in verifying the f.lux they downloaded from 3rd party sources, there is this thread on the forum providing a hash of the official file. https://justgetflux.com/forum/topic/1267/sha-1-for-ios-sideload https://justgetflux.com/forum/topic/1267/sha-1-for-ios-sidel...