> There was no "conclusion"/assertion that flour > rice. In your original post, you say "... but that rice is much more healthy than the vitamin-fortified subs

> There was no "conclusion"/assertion that flour > rice. In your original post, you say "... but that rice is much more healthy than the vitamin-fortified substance made out of bleached, white flower that we call bread nowadays." So, perhaps not a conclusion, but an assertion then. Semantics aside, I believe a statement like that should be backed up by data, and I've been unable to find any data that backs up your claim. So again, I ask to know what you're basing that assertion on.