2 ms·
>>Perhaps one should notice that this is one of the few hacks that people aren't doing.<< You told us -- "Since I'm lazy, I'll point out that most of the stuff
by igouy 11y ago
>>Perhaps one should notice that this is one of the few hacks that people aren't doing.<<
You told us -- "Since I'm lazy, I'll point out that most of the stuff is indirectly mentioned in this write-up: https://llogiq.github.io/2015/10/03/fast.html" https://llogiq.github.io/2015/10/03/fast.html"
Here's what people will read if they look there --
"However, since the generator only produces 139968 separate numbers, the Haskell code just caches them all in an array."
Now you're telling us that is not being done.
- Veedrac 11y agoApologies, I see why that wording was confusing. A more specific phrasing would be "the Haskell code just caches the results from the linear search in an array for each possible input." The Haskell code does not cache the RNG output itself. I've asked Llogiq to update the wording.