3 ms·
This is something I had a hard time understanding and which I thought the article did a poor job of explaining. In exploiting a remote system, which part of yo
by brown9-2 17y ago
This is something I had a hard time understanding and which I thought the article did a poor job of explaining.
In exploiting a remote system, which part of your attack would benefit from being encrypted?
- gregcmartin 17y agoOk so they use what's called packers to not only obfuscate the malware code to bypass signature based A/V but also hide inside other binaries or Dll's to further evade heuristic defenses. Then a reverse encrypted tunnel for control of infected machine was routed over normal HTTPS also undetectable by IDS. It was to dynamic dns domains such as yahoo1.dyndns.org. Reverse meaning it connects back to the attacker to allow ssh like access to the compromised host via the trojan. There are all extremely advanced (but known) evasion steps for a very targeted attack. It's rare to see all of them successfully used in one attack because of the complexity and skill required.
- starev 17y agoIf you encrypted or otherwise obfuscated the payload of the attack, it would make log analysis (particularly on the network level) difficult, and may help get around things like an IDS. It'd also make some forms of forensics much harder.