3 ms·
It was pretty unclear what the actual reason for not releasing the scrolls was. The article mumbles something about 'power', but doesn't really explain what th
by simplicio 11y ago
It was pretty unclear what the actual reason for not releasing the scrolls was. The article mumbles something about 'power', but doesn't really explain what that means. It's sort of a weird end to a lengthy (and pretty wordy) article, that builds at great length towards the development of a technique to read the scrolls, and then sort of tosses in the fact that they can't use the technique without really exploring why outside of a single ambiguous sentence.
Its hardly clear why locking the scrolls in the basement for another few decades would increase the Institutes power. Having a bunch of unreadable papayri sitting in a box doesn't do much for the Institute, while having them revealed to be the only copies of works by Epicures (or whomever) could only increase their prestige/power/monetary value.
- WildUtah 11y agoWell, at the current rate, it won't be too long before copyright extends 2000 years and then the Institute can claim it and demand a royalty from everyone who wants to know what they say.