4 ms·
Could we include the other part of the subtitle - it seems that without the context of the second-part it will diverge this discussion strictly to the "Hack" -
by forgotpwtomain 11y ago
Could we include the other part of the subtitle - it seems that without the context of the second-part it will diverge this discussion strictly to the "Hack" - where as it really should read:
> Massive Hack of 70 Million Prisoner Phone Calls Indicates Violations of Attorney-Client Privilege
- doug1001 11y agogood point--a Constitutional violation no less. I wonder if t's more than a violation of the 4th Amendment, perhaps 6th as well ("effective assistance of counsel" or something like that) In any event, an ACLU directory quoted in the article says that this hack "[m]ay be the most massive breach of the attorney-client privilege in modern U.S. history"