You can call it that, however this is not asset forfeiture, it's asset freezing (which is vastly different). Furthermore, there is a four point test that judges

You can call it that, however this is not asset forfeiture, it's asset freezing (which is vastly different). Furthermore, there is a four point test that judges use to determine if a freezing order is valid. It very rarely impacts anyone aside from perpetrators of fraud. It is nothing like you claim, because if the government loses their case the assets are unfrozen. They can't use them, nor do they have actual access to them, until the case ends in a guilty verdict.